Impact of the veto on MiCA in Poland
Introduction: Poland at the Crossroads of Crypto Regulation
In July 2023, events in Poland caught the attention of the crypto community: President Karol Nawrocki vetoed the bill to implement European MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations into national law. This move triggered mixed reactions: some saw it as protecting business from bureaucratization, others as a threat to the future of the country's crypto market. With the EU-wide implementation of MiCA scheduled for 2026, Poland finds itself in a difficult position between the need for adaptation and the risk of losing its competitive edge.
In this material, we will analyze the current situation, assess risks for users and businesses, and examine the international experience of MiCA implementation.
The Veto Policy: Key Arguments and Consequences
The MiCA implementation bill rejected by the Polish president drew criticism for its complex and rigid structure, as well as a significant expansion of the powers of the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF). Main concerns relate to potential pressure on innovative businesses and the stalling of crypto industry development in the country.
International Experience: What Poland Could Learn from Its Neighbors
In countries like the Czech Republic and Hungary, MiCA implementation was smoother: bills were adapted with minimal bureaucratic burden on businesses. This allowed local crypto companies to confidently enter the new legal regime and avoid excessive regulatory instability.
However, Polish legislation took a complicated path, preparing a voluminous and confusing document that potentially creates barriers to industry development. This strengthens the trend of business “leakage” to countries with more favorable conditions.
Economic and Social Risks: Negative Consequences for the Country
Damage to Business and the Economy
-
Capital and intellectual resource flight
Crypto companies are already considering relocating to countries with friendlier conditions. Such an outflow of business will lead to reduced tax revenues and the loss of competitive advantages. -
Loss of investment
Attracting global capital investments becomes more difficult amid regulatory uncertainty. -
Potential decline in innovation activity
Harsh or confusing legislative requirements can undermine the motivation of startups and tech entrepreneurs to operate in Poland. According to rough estimates by economists, in the event of a significant outflow of companies to other jurisdictions, Poland could lose up to 1% of GDP annually due to lost taxes and job cuts.
Risks for Users
For private investors and crypto users, the situation also remains difficult.
-
High vulnerability to scammers
In the absence of clear regulatory mechanisms, the user base is at risk of falling victim to fraud: already about 18% of Poles have encountered crypto scams. -
Lack of legal protection tools
Unlike countries that have adapted MiCA, Polish users have no platform for conflict resolution or appealing suspicious transactions, which increases legal uncertainty.
International Example: How to Do It Better
To develop an effective strategy, Poland could consider the successful experience of EU countries such as Estonia, where the implementation of MiCA standards was carried out taking into account the interests of both the state and the private sector. There, the crypto industry received support in the form of consultations, transparent implementation schedules, and accessible compliance tools.
Such measures can minimize the burden on business and maintain user trust while ensuring a stable transition to new rules.
How Can Users Protect Themselves Under Uncertainty?
While the situation in Poland remains in limbo, crypto investors should take steps to minimize potential risks:
-
Use reliable platforms with a license
Only work with exchanges and wallets that follow KYC (Know Your Customer) and AML (Anti-Money Laundering) standards. -
Check transfer addresses
Use AML screening tools — this helps identify if wallets are linked to fraudulent activity or sanctions. -
Avoid suspicious schemes
If an offer seems too good to be true, it likely hides a fraud risk. -
Study the legislation
Regularly follow changes in rules and news to be ready for new requirements and adapt to changes. Simple precautions will help avoid problems with blocked funds or loss of assets.
Conclusion: A Step Forward or a Missed Opportunity?
The veto on the MiCA implementation bill threatens Poland's competitiveness in the European crypto market. An approach involving excessive bureaucratization increases uncertainty for businesses and users, creating risks for the country's economy.
However, the solution lies in a rational approach: instead of a total rejection of European standards, Poland could adapt MiCA on its own terms, minimizing bureaucratic pressure and supporting innovative companies.
Until the situation stabilizes, both users and companies must be extremely careful with their decisions in the cryptocurrency sphere: using secure tools, education, and working with verified platforms remain the key principles for preserving resources.